Case Mis-Conceptualization in Psychological Treatment : An Enduring Clinical Problem

© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical psychology, Vol. 73, No. 4 (2017), p. 359-375
Main Author: Ridley, Charles R
Other Involved Persons: Jeffrey, Christina E ; Roberson, Richard B 3rd
Format: electronic Article
Language:English
ISSN:1097-4679
Item Description:Date Completed 04.09.2017
Date Revised 04.09.2017
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
Copyright: From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Physical Description:Online-Ressource
DOI:10.1002/jclp.22354
Subjects:
QR Code: Show QR Code
LEADER 02972nma a2200553 c 4500
001 NLM268065497
003 DE-601
005 20181229200650.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180206s2017 000 0 eng d
024 7 |a 10.1002/jclp.22354  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed19n0893.xml 
035 |a (DE-599)NLM28085194 
040 |b ger  |c GBVCP 
041 0 |a eng 
100 1 |a Ridley, Charles R 
245 1 0 |a Case Mis-Conceptualization in Psychological Treatment  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b An Enduring Clinical Problem 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
500 |a Date Completed 04.09.2017 
500 |a Date Revised 04.09.2017 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
500 |a Copyright: From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine 
520 |a © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 
520 |a Case conceptualization, an integral component of mental health treatment, aims to facilitate therapeutic gains by formulating a clear picture of a client's psychological presentation. However, despite numerous attempts to improve this clinical activity, it remains unclear how well existing methods achieve their purported purpose. Case formulation is inconsistently defined in the literature and implemented in practice, with many methods varying in complexity, theoretical grounding, and empirical support. In addition, many of the methods demand a precise clinical acumen that is easily influenced by judgmental and inferential errors. These errors occur regardless of clinicians' level of training or amount of clinical experience. Overall, the lack of a consensus definition, a diversity of methods, and susceptibility of clinicians to errors are manifestations of the state of crisis in case conceptualization. This article, the 2nd in a series of 5 on thematic mapping, argues the need for more reliable and valid models of case conceptualization 
611 2 7 |a Journal Article  |2 gnd 
653 2 |a Humans  |6 D006801 
653 2 |a Mental Disorders  |6 D001523  |a *diagnosis  |6 Q000175  |a therapy  |6 Q000628 
653 2 |a *Models, Psychological  |6 D008960 
653 2 |a Professional Competence  |6 D011361  |a *standards  |6 Q000592 
653 2 |a Psychotherapy  |6 D011613  |a *methods  |6 Q000379  |a *standards  |6 Q000592 
655 7 |a case formulation  |2 gnd 
655 7 |a clinical crisis  |2 gnd 
655 7 |a clinical judgment  |2 gnd 
655 7 |a treatment  |2 gnd 
689 0 0 |A f  |a Journal Article 
689 0 |5 DE-601 
689 1 0 |a case formulation 
689 1 1 |a clinical crisis 
689 1 2 |a clinical judgment 
689 1 3 |a treatment 
689 1 |5 DE-601 
700 1 |a Jeffrey, Christina E 
700 1 |a Roberson, Richard B  |c 3rd 
773 0 8 |i in  |t Journal of clinical psychology  |g Vol. 73, No. 4 (2017), p. 359-375  |q 73:4<359-375  |w (DE-601)NLM000031291  |x 1097-4679 
856 4 1 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22354  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 73  |j 2017  |e 4  |c 04  |h 359-375