A qualitative investigation of Johnson's typology

The couple typology described by Johnson and Ferraro (2000) provided the framework for this analysis of narrative accounts of couples in violent heterosexual relationships. Participants were 15 bidirectionally violent couples who were interviewed separately for about 1 hour each. Modified analytic i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Violence and victims, Vol. 20, No. 3 (2005), p. 319-34
Main Author: Rosen, Karen H
Other Involved Persons: Stith, Sandra M ; Few, April L ; Daly, Kathryn L ; Tritt, Dari R
Format: Article
Language:English
ISSN:0886-6708
Item Description:Date Completed 16.12.2005
Date Revised 09.11.2019
published: Print
Citation Status MEDLINE
Copyright: From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Subjects:
QR Code: Show QR Code
LEADER 02554naa a2200517 c 4500
001 NLM157938506
003 DE-601
005 20191111042343.0
008 180204s2005 000 0 eng d
028 5 2 |a pubmed19n1587.xml 
035 |a (DE-599)NLM16180370 
040 |b ger  |c GBVCP 
041 0 |a eng 
100 1 |a Rosen, Karen H 
245 1 2 |a A qualitative investigation of Johnson's typology 
500 |a Date Completed 16.12.2005 
500 |a Date Revised 09.11.2019 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
500 |a Copyright: From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine 
520 |a The couple typology described by Johnson and Ferraro (2000) provided the framework for this analysis of narrative accounts of couples in violent heterosexual relationships. Participants were 15 bidirectionally violent couples who were interviewed separately for about 1 hour each. Modified analytic induction guided the analyses. We categorized the violence in the relationships of these 15 couples in the following ways: 11 were categorized as "common couple" violence; two as "violent resistance"; one as "mutual violent control"; and one couple was categorized as what we named "pseudo-intimate terrorism." We present rich descriptions of each category and motivations for and impacts of aggressive behavior as well as our rationale for classifying couples the way we did. Implications for intervention and future research are discussed 
611 2 7 |a Journal Article  |2 gnd 
653 2 |a Adult  |6 D000328 
653 2 |a Aggression  |6 D000374  |a psychology  |6 Q000523 
653 2 |a Family Characteristics  |6 D005191 
653 2 |a Female  |6 D005260 
653 2 |a *Heterosexuality  |6 D020010  |a psychology  |6 Q000523 
653 2 |a Humans  |6 D006801 
653 2 |a *Internal-External Control  |6 D007389 
653 2 |a *Interpersonal Relations  |6 D007398 
653 2 |a Male  |6 D008297 
653 2 |a Middle Aged  |6 D008875 
653 2 |a *Models, Psychological  |6 D008960 
653 2 |a Spouse Abuse  |6 D013179  |a classification  |6 Q000145  |a *psychology  |6 Q000523 
653 2 |a Surveys and Questionnaires  |6 D011795 
653 2 |a Virginia  |6 D014768 
689 0 0 |A f  |a Journal Article 
689 0 |5 DE-601 
700 1 |a Stith, Sandra M 
700 1 |a Few, April L 
700 1 |a Daly, Kathryn L 
700 1 |a Tritt, Dari R 
773 0 8 |i in  |t Violence and victims  |g Vol. 20, No. 3 (2005), p. 319-34  |q 20:3<319-34  |w (DE-601)NLM012750948  |x 0886-6708 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 20  |j 2005  |e 3  |c 06  |h 319-34